On 5/22/2010 10:06 PM, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2010-05-21 at 18:23 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > >> Been doing some recursion. I'll probably figure a way around this with a >> loop counter. However, it might be nice to add a few features to Exim to >> deal with recursion. Just like to throw out some ideas. >> >> The limit it 20. Maybe it would be nice to make it settable? >> >> Is there a recursion loop counter that I can read? If not - maybe there >> should be? >> >> Thoughts? >> > I think that I warned you of this problem and described how to avoid it > when you first talked about your new Exim ACLs for handling URLs inside > messages. > > It would be Quite Nice if you would read and act on responses instead of > asking how to deal with what you've already been told how to deal with. > Especially as you were told how to deal with the problem. > > http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20090310.203700.ea1a1fa7.en.html > > Fourteen months later ... > > -Phil > >
I'm suggesting improvement for those of us what are using Exim as a programming language. Exim would be better if it were more of a programming language. I know what you told me. I just strongly disagree. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
