On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Martin A. Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, June 4, 2010 22:38, W B Hacker wrote: >> Presuming this applies only to (the balance of) the current session and >> child >> process, why should it be a 'PANIC' situation anyway? Hard-coded PANIC, >> IMNSHO, >> should be reserved for events/absence of events that impair the ability of >> the >> MTA to function at all. > > Here are words I don't often speak: I agree with Bill. > > DKIM sig mismatches appearing in paniclog is silly.
Thanks for all the feedback. I changed that log to be sent only to mainlog, no longer sending to main and paniclog. I updated bug 966 but didn't close because I didn't address the question of adding more library-specific debug to the error. I just don't want it in my panic logs anymore, and it appears no one else does either. --John -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
