On 2010-07-10 at 17:19 -0700, Phillip Carroll wrote: > If I understand exim correctly check_local_user looks up $local_part as > a local user. Therefore, I added $local_part to the fail message in the > localuser transport to see what is being looked up. (With the resuilt > shown above) Given the fact that mercury is only an alias and not the > actual aliased user, that explains the failure of check_local_user. > Then I don't understand why the data assignments in the virtual_aliases > routers are not passing the actual user through to the localuser router.
Why are you using "unseen" on the Router which does the aliasing? That means that the aliased address is being generated as a secondary routing recipient and the main address continues through. -Phil -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
