On 2010-08-18 at 12:04 -0700, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > Anyway, all I did was transplant my configuration change, > exactly as I wrote it last night, from the > file under conf.d to the single configuration template.
You really should take a look at: /usr/share/doc/exim4/README.Debian.gz > But multiple things refer to the address_file transport. > Is it really okay to do this? > > For instance the "mail4root" router wants to be able > to use the address_file transport to add > to /var/mail/mail. > > Surely, the right thing is to create a new transport > which is a clone of address_file, but under a different > name? Correct. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
