On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 00:21 -0400, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2010-08-29 at 18:15 +0100, John Horne wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 01:20 -0400, Phil Pennock wrote: > > > Clearly the parse logic in Exim needs to be a little more careful. I'm > > > apparently in the middle of developing a head-cold which is messing up > > > my ability to think clearly, so don't feel that any code I wrote now > > > would be worth the electrons used to encode it. So, patches welcome. > > > I've had a quick look at the code, and I think it should be possible to > > cater for this case. I'll bugzilla the problem, and submit a patch if I > > can devise one. > > Not seeing a bugzilla mail and I'm #...@$%ed if I can figure out (again) > how to get a list of all open bugs from that software. Sometimes I can, > sometimes it wins. > > Here's my patch against malware.c which makes the ClamAV response > handling rather more robust. Let me know how it works for you? > Your patch returns the truncated name, whereas I went for exim returning the name clamav returns, and then let the user sort which bit they want. However, I suspect yours will be more likely required :-)
I have been using your patch on a server today, and it works fine both with and without the clamav extendedinfo option. John. -- John Horne Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 University of Plymouth, UK Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
