Hi
>> this is the fast way to solve this problem and be sure that it will never
>> happen again with those f*ck*ng Barracuda appliances
>
> ??
>
> The 'fast' as in low-resource and highly predictable way is simpler and
> requires
> less 'logic':
>
> In the remote_smtp (or equivalent) transport, add/include:
>
> headers_remove = Received
>
> CAVEATS:
>
> - Violates spirit if not letter of RFC.
> (But not as badly as filtering on the wrong headers!)
>
> - Wise to have an *unaltered* copy archived for troubleshooting. We store two
> -
> one by originator, the other by destination - for quicker findingness.
sorry, when i said fast i mean faster than having to contact the remote
postmaster. anyway setting up a recived header with no ip is more rfc
compliant but if you do forwarding headers_remove = Received is the
right one
--
Best regards ...
----------------------------------------------------------------
David Saez Padros http://www.ols.es
On-Line Services 2000 S.L. telf +34 902 50 29 75
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
