dani wrote: > On 11/29/2010 10:18 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> UUCP is a superior idea. I'm using it for ages now to send and receive >> mail on my laptop. I didn't expect somebody thinking about it. >> >> IMHO it is exactly designed for only partly connected hosts. >> If you want, I can find my UUCP config today's afternoon. >> >> > thanks! it would be nice of you while i read some more about it ! > >
Dani, Please DO read / go ogle more about uucp! It has an interesting legacy of security issues - less so for restricted two-box point-to-point use (as illustrated in Heiko's post), than for the way it was used as a more widely shared resource years ago - but nonetheless still demanding of careful setup. Given his demonstrated level of expertise, I am confidant that Heiko has taken steps to guard against vulnerabilities, but - 'generally' - there is more to it than just the exim setup in his post. Well worth a bit of research before jumping in from a cold start... Regards, Bill -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
