S Pratap Singh wrote: > As Leena Suggested to test DKIM on check-auth()verifier.port25.com > Here is the result > > The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team > > ========================================================== > Summary of Results > ========================================================== > SPF check: pass > DomainKeys check: neutral > DKIM check: pass > Sender-ID check: pass > SpamAssassin check: ham > > > Thank you > Pratap Singh
Pratap, That's all well and good. And the 'newness' of the domain.tld and short TTL in the DNS will *eventually* not be a barrier, either. But before you invest much more effort in testing, have a think on what Todd pointed out, and I confirmed: The .info TLD has a bad reputation. Bad enough to not only get diverted to spam, but even unconditionally hard-blocked. Not everyone will do that, but our experience is not unique. EG: If .info is not spam-always, then .info is spam-mostly. If you don't want to use a less notorious TLD than .info, then perhaps using a 'smarthost' with a less obnoxious TLD for your outbound traffic would be wise. If your business plan was to send unsolicited, or 'formerly' solicited, but now nuisance traffic, then - hey - just keep right on with what you are doing. Those flies will never reach MY watermelon. ;-) Bill -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
