Hi, Bill,

On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 12:39:47 +0000 in message number 
<[email protected]>, received here on 09/04/2011 15:38:28, W B 
Hacker <[email protected]> said:

> Bill Hayles wrote:
> > Hi, fellow Bill,
> 
> Greets..
> 
> ;-)
> 
> *snip*
> 
> >> will eventually show up.. see below in re rDNS.
> >
> > OK, not strictly Exim related, but one of my hobbyhorses. If you do
> > that, you block a lot of legitimate servers (including mine!).
> 
> Not so!  I AM running Exim rDNS check, and did NOT block your direct OFF 
> tahini response.
> 
> You(r server) passed the rDNS check for the IP from whence you 
> connected:  craybox.com  .....on 80.35.22.107.
> 
>  From *manual* inspection with 'host' and 'dig', one could argue that 
> you should NOT have passed...

Interesting, and thanks for the test.  It could be said that I should use
the rDNS result as my primary_hostname, but I don't really want to do that.


> .... but Exim's rDNS checking is very 'wise' w/r not rejecting unless it 
> has to..

Fair enough.  You know much more about this than me.
> 
>> Also, this approach does not catch spam  mail from infected computers
>> (of which I get plenty).
> 
> Oh, but it DOES!  Near-as-dammit 100% of it.

I think you're teaching me something, and there's something I'm not
understanding. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I have a (now former) former mailing list subscriber.  Let's call them
[email protected]. For the last couple of weeks, this address has been
sending me 20 or 30 spam messages per day from 65.54.190.140, which resolves
to hotmail.com.  I thought that the easiest way for me to deal with them is
to reject them via a simple deny message. 

> 
> Wot becomes infected AND NOT noticed or corrected for *long* periods at 
> a time are predominantly the ordinary residential or SME user's 
> 'Win-desktop'.

That's what I'm dealing with here.
> 
> Those are *nearly always* on dynamic IP with no PTR RR, hence no way to 
> reverse that IP via a PTR RR to an A or MX record match.

Agreed, but that isn't showing up in the Exim logs.  The  lines are similar
to

2011-04-02 11:57:37 1Q6gXQ-0003pj-33 <= [email protected]
H=(bay0-omc3-s2.bay0.hotmail.com) [65.54.190.140] P=esmtp S=6227
[email protected]

> Those WILL fail Exim's rDNS check. As they should do.

But the example above won't, unless I've misunderstood something.
> 
> Easy enough to check.

OK, I'll do it. I'll let you know the results.


-- 
This is Spain.  We do things differently here!

Bill Hayles
[email protected]


-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to