On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:10 +0000, W B Hacker wrote: > But not dependent on one pair of eyeballs being awake, on-watch, > coherent, and not distracted by other demands...
Exactly. Being a fairly UK-timezone-centric diurnal operation (a University) we can easily afford, in most cases, to freeze emails for up to 12 to 20 hours to allow the Mk 1 human eyeball (Fowler or Cardwell variant, most times) to assess the frozen messages. In one case, however, we did trip up a rather sensitive person in the upper management. Now the risks have been explained to said person, we've implemented a file-base rate list for specific senders which overrides the default. The beauty of this is that it works both above and below the default, so if we have a "repeat offender" we can make the system more sensitive if necessary. There is no substitute to human intervention in the case where an anomaly has been detected by machine, because we can apply shades of grey. Graeme -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
