Bill. I wonder if you might have more luck receiving the extra traffic by converting your servers to support rfc 1149.
;) Hill This message has been sent using a mobile communication device. On 21 May 2011, at 19:45, W B Hacker <[email protected]> wrote: > Wolfgang Breyha wrote: >> On 2011-05-20 16:38, Ian Eiloart wrote: >>> On 2011-05-20 12:48, W B Hacker wrote: >>>> C) Most current MUA even if 'fed' 8 bit-anything seem to be predisposed to >>>> ass u me the worst, and wrap it as quoted-printable. >>>> In the MUA, not the MTA. >>> >>> They'll certainly do that when an MTA fails to advertise 8bitmime. >> >> Not as certainly as expected. Eg. Thunderbird 3 has not a single line of >> code neither to recognize 8BITMIME nor for sending BODY= in MAIL FROM. >> >> I just checked it in >> mailnews/compose/src/nsSmtpProtocol.cpp >> for 3.1.10. >> >> But since >> mail.strictly_mime >> defaults to false it sends using transfer encoding 8bit regardless what the >> MTA supports. >> >> So one of the major MUAs out there cares even less as qmail about 8BITMIME;-) >> >> Greetings, Wolfgang > > SeaMonkey here. > > Still enough shared code with T-bird that I'm not even going to look. > > Might as well set my servers to advertise: > > COLDBEER > > Dunno wot RFC covers that, but suspect it would see more traffic than: > > 8BITMIME > > > ;-) > > Bill > > -- > ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/ -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
