On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 13:56, Ian Eiloart <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Then I'm confused by "Obsoleted by: 5322" at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822. > > And by "Obsoletes: 2822" at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322 > And possibly by what "draft standard" means. No worries, it essentially just means that it's mostly ready for use in production environments, that at least two different actual implementations of the standard exist in the wild, but that there can still be errata. Where RFC 5321 and 5322 differ from RFC 2821 and 2822, I would caution against interpreting RFC 5321 and 5322 strictly. These RFCs are so fresh and new (yes, really) that you cannot expect implementations to be up-to-date. AFAICR, there are still implementations that pretend that RFC 2821 and 2822 have not quite happened yet. > > Still, 2822 says the same thing. > Ah, yes, indeed it does, in section 3.6. The conclusion should, anyway, still be to be moderate in what you send – that is, to avoid things that might cause problems. I should have written that more clearly in my previous post, that I do think multiple subject headers is a bad idea. -- Jan -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
