Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:27, Mike Cardwell
<[email protected]>wrote:
SPF causes mail delivery problems in some scenarios. I don't think
anyone would deny that. From my experience, in practice, your email is
more likely to be rejected because of a false positive on a spam
filtering system than it is to be rejected because of one of these SPF
issues. I don't ever see anyone arguing against the use of spam
filtering though.
The difference between spam filtering and SPF is that you can usually get
around spam filtering.
But to get around a faulty (IMO) SPF record, you can essentially just give
up.
Perhaps a 'Senior Moment' here - but I *thought* DKIM was the fix to
(some of) the SPF shortcomings, and had become the more widely adopted
toolset?
Mind - not that I use either one (nor greylisting, nor SpamAssassin, nor
...
YMMV, but if one is to use such things, I suspect DKIM is already the
only one still well-supported.
Bill
--
韓家標
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
