On 8 Jul 2011, at 17:08, Bill Hayles wrote: > Hi, Ian > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:29:00 +0000 in message number > <[email protected]>, received here on > 08/07/2011 17:52:29, Ian Eiloart <[email protected]> said: > >> >> On 7 Jul 2011, at 14:31, Bill Hayles wrote: >> >>>> But why not give users the tools to set up spam filters on the server, >>>> where smtp time rejection is an option. >>> >>> The honest answer is that I don't know how to - only to apply such filters >>> on a global scale. Something I need to look into. >> >> We use a web application to write various options into our LDAP directory. >> There is one eternal problem: once you've seen the data, you can't do >> individual filtering if there's more than one recipient. > > Not something simple, then, given that I'm not running a LDAP server.
I guess, but a flat file would do just as well. We prefer the LDAP server because it -and our mail server- is clustered. > At the moment, I have more than adequate resources to let users deal with > spam after I've accepted it. I take on board the comments about that only > encouraging the spammers, and I certainly accept that user bouncing is a bad > idea; I'll check that nobody is doing it. > > Nevertheless, thanks for taking the time and trouble to reply; I appreciate > it. > > -- > This is Spain. We do things differently here! > > Bill Hayles > [email protected] > > > -- > ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/ -- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148 -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
