Hello.
I have a scenario where i have setup routers and transports to force some
messages to be routed to specific hosts that require authentication.
In this scenario, i try this client authenticator config and this don't work:
client_plain_1:
driver = plaintext
public_name = PLAIN
client_send = ^user_of_host_1^pass
client_login_1:
driver = plaintext
public_name = LOGIN
client_send = : user_of_host_1 : pass
client_plain_2:
driver = plaintext
public_name = PLAIN
client_send = ^user_of_host_2^pass
client_login_2:
driver = plaintext
public_name = LOGIN
client_send = : user_of_host_2 : pass
This returns me:
2011-08-18 16:05:23 Exim configuration error:
two client authenticators (client_plain_1 and client_plain_2) have the same
public name (PLAIN)
2011-08-18 16:05:23 Exim configuration error:
two client authenticators (client_plain_1 and client_plain_2) have the same
public name (PLAIN)
But, if i change to use only one host with authentication (lefting the another
routing and transporting yet, but without act as client auth) it's work.
Then, with this setup:
client_plain_1:
driver = plaintext
public_name = PLAIN
client_send = ^user_of_host_1^pass
client_login_1:
driver = plaintext
public_name = LOGIN
client_send = : user_of_host_1 : pass
It's work (but, as my second host requires auth, the messages transported to it
come back to me, but okay).
As i really need authenticate on both servers, why my first setup don't work?
I agree that if all public_name is used on the same connection don't would be
possible to determine what is the correct public name to use, but this isn't
occurs on my scenario.
Can someone help-me or perhaps this is some feature that i would implement with
some self-made patch?
Thanks
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
