W B Hacker, 2011-10-31 05:15: > Jakob, had this been written in Deutsch, I'd not be presuming to tell > you about *my* dificulty understanding that language.
Again, I don't know what you are trying to tell me. That I'm too stupid to understand your language? >>> 'endpass' after an 'accept' can skip all remaining clauses in a given >>> phase. > Endpass after *anything* can so skip. What do you mean? After any verb? Surely not, as it is only defined for accept and discard. And again: endpass does not have anything to do with skipping anything. > Yes, it happens that 'accept' carries it inherently, but no harm is done > - for sake of consistency in style - in applying it to 'accept' as well > as other needfuls. What do you mean? That one should put endpass after every accept? > As I said ... So far, we agree in substance - even though you have > twice contradicted yourself. Really? Where did I contradict myself? > Not 'til you complexified it, anyway. Huh? _You_ were the one bringing endpass into the game in your reply to the OP. If you can explain, what it has to do with skipping, please do so. In _clear_ language, if you are able to. Otherwise, save your and my time and consider this the EOT. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
