On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Nigel Metheringham <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to clarify - I have no objections whatsoever to work being done > to provide a milter interface/api/whatever to exim, as long as it is > done in a clean fashion. > > A way of reusing mail filtering/transformation code between platforms > would, in most cases, be a good thing.
I agree. Personally I would want it for the sole purpose of being able to use Murray's main project (opendkim) instead of the built in DKIM. I have no complaints about exim's DKIM support, I would just like to standardize our site (half sendmail, half exim) to use the same DKIM software. > However, realistically, this is not going to get done unless someone > has that particular itch that needs scratching, and so gets on and > does that development work. I suspect that, based on whats happened > over the last years, thats unlikely. Last year, I worked on adapting some beginnings of code that a gentleman had done against 4.66 as part of a graduate project. My c fu is weak sauce though, so I never got much beyond planting his beginning code into current exim. The code is not useful yet and it's a bit beyond my skillset and time availability. I would use it, but don't have the skills to see it through to fruition. Regards... Todd -- SOPA: Any attempt to [use legal means to] reverse technological advances is doomed. --Leo Leporte -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
