Ian Eiloart wrote:
On 7 Feb 2012, at 09:02, W B Hacker wrote:
Don't GENERATE bounces to off-box 'strangers'. At all. Allow ONLY
'DSN' to your own 'local' user pool, virtual or shell.
Actually, I don't see why you shouldn't do that
?? Seems fairly obvious that if 100% of rejections from outside-world
are handled at smtp-time, AND we take onboard only what we can (and DO)
deliver...
..there can be no situation that would REQUIRE an 'out-of-band' or
post-session DSN to a 'stranger'.
They'll generate their OWN if/as/when a server of ours is unreachable.
As to our own user-community, sure there are.
- Far-end rejection for ANY reason.
- Retry timeout on unreachable destinations.
for a return-path
address that's verified with an SPF pass, or a DKIM verified From:
header address that uses the same domain as the signing domain. If
recipients of such bounces have a complaint, it should be directed to
the domain owner.
Irrelevant. Not germane.
There are no bounces to BE sent.
Even if there were, the CF's mentioned are not reliable.
Bill
--
韓家標
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
