On 2012-05-21 at 14:58 +0100, Dennis Davis wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2012, Phil Pennock wrote: > > Any idea if they're moving towards the NetBSD resolver changes? > > Not sure what these changes are.
Thread-safety with a different set of resolver routines avoiding _res. http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?resolver++NetBSD-6.0 > They seem to be moving towards ditching BIND and replacing it with > unbound: I have unbound as the system resolver on my dev box, for validating DNSSEC; it doesn't change the libc interfaces. It's just something else to listen on ports 53. It includes a libunbound, which can be used *instead* of the libc interfaces. It doesn't include variants for getaddrinfo() et al. -Phil -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
