Todd Lyons wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Mike Lyon<[email protected]> wrote:
Well, I have the forward and reverse IPs matching. Don't have any MX
records for that specific domain set-up because I don't have any inbound
mail setup for that domain (nor do I want it).
Set up an MX record that indicates that then.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
It may only be draft, but I've seen it in the past in live production.
It's an IP block that was allocated to us from ATT on a business circuit. I
checked the IP addresses on MX toolbox and they come up clean
That's a good thing.
Would they actually refuse the connection if there were no MX records for
that domain?
If they do, then they break fallback to A records as defined in the RFC's.
...Todd
Forensics taken offline. Testing completed.
Not a Google issue, nor Exim, nor DNS...
Stale FW rule on port 25 was penning Mike right in hizzown tcpip
stack... never left his own box.
Nothing further to see here...
;-)
Bill
--
韓家標
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
