W B Hacker <[email protected]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> solution in GIT (keep 1024 limit, but add tls_dh_min_bits SMTP transport >> option) is perfectly fine. Which is why we have applied the patch >> to Debian's exim package.
> Andreas, > I have no horse in this race, but 'for completeness sake' of those wo > may, have, how does that square with Marc Haber's note of 3 June with; > == >> The Debian configuration will stay as it is >> as far as my decision is concened. > === > .. that I took to be a(nother) pico-diverge of sorts.. > Or am I presuming a relationship not germane atall? Hello, Marc's mail <[email protected]> was about a specific, completely different proposed change (Removing syntactically unneccessary but clarifying "no_more" settings in routers.) > IOW, WEF 4.8X, will the Debian package differ from 'generic' in other > than naming, paths, config, other 'usual suspects'? There are no big changes in 4.80 packaging, see the 2012 entries in http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/e/exim4/exim4_4.80-3/changelog cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
