On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Dennis Davis wrote:
> From: Dennis Davis <[email protected]>
> To: Marius Stan <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:29:54
> Subject: Re: [exim] sending to only one domain per connection
...
> ...all sounds a bit primitive to me. Perhaps they should be using
> exim as their smtp server...
Oh boy, strike out "a bit primitive" and submit phrases such as
"Mickey Mouse", "blatant incompetence" etc. And I should apologise
to Mickey Mouse as well. He isn't in the same company.
I had a message delivery failure for the message sent to:
Marius Stan <[email protected]>
Here's the exim log:
2012-06-27 14:29:55 1SjsJf-0001iT-CI H=hinault.bath.ac.uk [138.38.56.28]
I=[138.38.0.34]:587 Warning: X-mailer:
id=<[email protected]> Client=Alpine 2.02 (BSO
1266 2009-07-14) [email protected]
2012-06-27 14:29:56 1SjsJf-0001iT-CI <= [email protected]
H=hinault.bath.ac.uk [138.38.56.28] I=[138.38.0.34]:587 P=esmtpsa
X=TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256 A=cyrus_sasl_authenticator:ccsdhd S=1879
[email protected]
2012-06-27 14:30:04 1SjsJf-0001iT-CI ** [email protected] R=internet_domains
T=internet_smtp: SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data: host
mail.asesoft.ro [86.105.247.13]: 550-Your message Re: [exim] sending to only
one domain per connection scored\n550-7.5 spam points. Report
follows:\n550-Spam detection software, running on the system "mail",
has\n550-identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message\n550-has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
label\n550-similar future email. If you have any questions, see\n550-the
administrator of that system for details.\n550-Content preview: On Tue, 26 Jun
2012, Marius Stan wrote: > From:\n550-Marius Stan\n550-<[email protected]> > To:
[email protected] > Date:\n550-Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:59:28\n550-> Subject:
[exim] sending to only one domain per connection > > I
guess\n550-you're\n550-already aware of the new limits imposed by >
google-hosted mail servers:\n550-> "Multiple destination domains per
transaction is unsupported" [...]\n550-Content analysis details: (7.5 points,
5.0 required)\n550-pts r
2012-06-27 14:30:13 1SjsJf-0001iT-CI => [email protected] R=internet_domains
T=internet_smtp H=tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.192]
2012-06-27 14:30:14 1SjsJy-0001kd-9k <= <> R=1SjsJf-0001iT-CI U=exim P=local
S=3686
2012-06-27 14:30:14 1SjsJf-0001iT-CI Completed
Look to me like they've set up Spamassassin, or something similar,
to score very highly because my message contained the lines:
To: Marius Stan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Certainly goes against the Spamassassin philosophy of not having one
thing cause a massive score.
If this is Google at work, then obviously it's their mail servers
and they can do what they like. And Google are big enough to throw
their weight about. Even though this is incompetent, bully-boy
tactics.
My advice is to not use such mail servers. Look for competence in
your service providers.
Tee-hee, this message also contains the lines:
To: Marius Stan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
so I'm expecting another failure.
--
Dennis Davis, BUCS, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
[email protected] Phone: +44 1225 386101
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
