On Sunday, July 15, 2012 07:14:34, Michael J. Tubby B.Sc G8TIC wrote:
> Kevin,
> 
> Rather than re-write the Reply-To: header why not just strip it off? The
> Reply-To header is used in preference to the From: for the return
> address, if it exists - but there's no requirement for it - AFAIK.

It may not be a requirement, but stripping the Reply-To: header is likely make 
it more difficult for users to deal with mailing lists, because I think a 
Reply will default to being sent to the author rather than the mailing list.

  -- Chris

--
Chris Knadle
[email protected]


> On 14/07/2012 21:54, Kevin wrote:
> > Looking into rewritting the Reply-To header...
> > 
> > Some info first:
> > 
> > We have a gateway server which does all the Internet mail transfers both
> > in and out.  It has a number of domains it provides mail services for.
> > 
> > On some of the domains, the email is forwarded to specific user accounts
> > to an Inside mail server using the that mail servers hostname and the
> > specific userid for that mailbox on that server (not always the same as
> > the inbound local part for that user using their domain).
> > 
> > So, lets say we have a user name fred with an Internet Email address of:
> > [email protected]
> > 
> > Email arrives and gets queued for the inside mail server for
> > [email protected]
> > 
> > Everything is cool...  The user gets the email using whatever protocol
> > they use and when they send email, it authenticates with the inside mail
> > server with that same address, and sets in the email their Internet
> > email address ( [email protected] in this case).
> > 
> > When it gets to the outside mail server it looks like:
> > 
> > Reply-To: [email protected]
> > From: [email protected]
> > 
> > However, once the message leaves the outside mail server, the Reply-To
> > header is bogus since there is no Internet known host called
> > inside.zipturtle.com so it would never get back to the gateway server
> > should it have to go several hops.
> > 
> > All of the examples that I see of rewriting deal with the same domain. 
> > In this case the inside and gateway server using a completely different
> > domain than the email address involved.  The From address is correct,
> > but the Reply-To headers make no sense after the email leaves the mail
> > gateway.
> > 
> > Hope this makes sense.


-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to