On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, W B Hacker wrote:
--snip--

End of the day, hard-blocking PowerMTA spew is still a low/no hassle plus. It has not even required offsetting White Listing. Which, after all, is dead-easy, and would have skipped that acl clause and many more.

A very LARGE plus, blocking PowerMTA is, as it smacks the multiple legions of entirely unrelated Merchant Bankers that are NOT 'desired' correspondents. It isn't as if that MTA had any other purpose but high-volume spew, after all.


I have not considered any of the mail I've mentioned to be spam.  I've
signed up for it, and in some cases, paid for it.


I may be lazy. Consumately so.


No comment.


But I 'laze' on the side of the time-efficiency of my user-community, not being swamped by spam out of 'you can't DO that' helplessness.


If I was a member of your user community, I'd be a bit upset at some of the spam filtering decisions you're making for me. Your mileage does vary, apparently.


--
--------------------------------------------------------
 Dave Lugo     [email protected]      No spam, thanks.
 Are you the police?  . . .  No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
--------------------------------------------------------

--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to