> The Doctor wrote: > > > > Problem is that o nthe other side > > a client has to perform gymnastics so that they can read to > > proprietary sent e-mail.
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 19:57 +0000, W B Hacker wrote: > Maybe. But WinPoo is so 'biquitous that most MUA have long-since been > equipped to deal with all that automagically and the Luser is not even > aware it has happened. > > So long as Exim mungeth nada and transfers transparently, it is being > 'righteous'. > > Doing otherwise looks to make a problem where there is none. Retrospectively attempting to cater for M$ propriety methods which are liable to change, may be a waste of finite resources. IBM did the same frequent propriety changes in the 1980's with its PS2 computer but the world had adopted the AT (80386 ?) design instead; that was the beginning of the end of IBM PC designer and manufacturer. Hopefully the world will now adhere to international standards and not seek to implement every non-standard M$ weirdness. Readers around the world may not understand "mungeth nada" or "the Dragons" or "out" (Hi Graeme) so using simplified jargon-less English aids universal understanding :-) Happy Christmas to everyone. -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
