On 01/11/2013 04:36 PM, tovis wrote:
I'm using exim4 configured with "smart host" on Debian Squeeze.
Also I have fetchmail, courier IMAP and apache2, php5, squirrelmail combo
for mailing (I have several two booting boxes with win and linux - it was
the easiest way to have mailing infrastructure for both systems). For long
time I have no pőropblems, but now I have got several error messages from
my "smart host":
Header (as it shown in Squirrelmail):
Return-path: <>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:30:40 +0100
Received: from Debian-exim by samu.bubu.dyndns.ws with local (Exim 4.63)
id 1Tsrzc-0001Lv-DR
for [email protected]; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:30:40 +0100
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
From: Mail Delivery System <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Message frozen
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:30:40 +0100
Message (as it shown in Squirrelmail):
Message 1Tsrzb-0001Ls-U7 has been frozen (delivery error message).
The sender is <>.
The following address(es) have yet to be delivered:
[email protected]: SMTP error from remote mail server after MAIL FROM:<>
SIZE=2673: host smtp.upcmail.hu [213.46.255.2]: 550 5.1.0 <> sender rejected
I think these emails are reading confirmation.
I think, that problem is "Return path" and "sender" fields are empty.
It could be solved by exim4 configuration? It could be the problem of
exim4? I'm not sure :(
Any help?
Is smtp.upcmail.hu you, or under your control? Is it your smart-host?
It looks like it's trying to deliver an empty-sender mail to "bigfirm.hu".
What's the relationship with your "dyndns.ws" address; why did it send this
notification there?
Can you find out why the empty-sender mail was produced? They're legitimate
for
Delivery Status Notifications (DSNs), of which one class is a "bounce" (that
is, a notification
of failure to deliver).
Have a look at your logs.
It could just be that "bigfirm" are clueless, in rejecting all DSNs.
It could, at the same time, be that some spammer faked a "bigfirm" sender
address, and you accepted the spam and only later decided you couldn't
deliver it, so you generated a bounce. This is legal per the mail protocol
standards, but suboptimal in a spam-filled world. If so you need to work
harder at spotting and rejecting spam during the SMTP conversation.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
