On 21 Feb 2013, at 17:13, Chris Knadle <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:30:10, Todd Lyons wro
> 
> I pulled the Exim master and found reference to the expired draft PRDR spec 
> in 
> /doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt:
> 
>   http://www.eric-a-hall.com/specs/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt
> 
> PRDR requires opt-in by the sending MTA during the MAIL FROM command, and 
> also 
> changes the response after the DATA command if there are per-recipient 
> handling differences.  This means that it only works with other MTAs that 
> also 
> implment PRDR, which at the moment sounds very rare.

Yes, that's right. But that's the only way of doing it. In effect, the two MTAs 
are agreeing to speak LMTP (I'm assuming the response list looks the same?) 
instead of SMTP. And that's because SMTP doesn't have any way of giving per 
recipient responses after seeing the data.

> If the other MTAs implement this it could be very worthwhile, but I'm not 
> sure 
> what the chances are of the MTAs getting support for this.

Well, I think the chances are quite good. It's clearly desirable for recipients 
to implement this, and given that it's entirely optional, I don't see any 
reason to have this off by default in Exim - except initially while confidence 
is gained. Exim has a substantial market share (see  
http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.201201/mxsurvey.html for 
example). 

It's also worth noting that a substantial proportion of mail, judging by my 
logs, has only a single recipient anyway. I can imagine that bulk senders might 
want to use this for efficiency reasons, since it will mean that they have a 
chance. Bulk senders might prefer PRDR to VERP, for efficiency reasons. They 
could, for example, decide to send to multiple recipients when they encounter 
PRDR servers, but use VERP otherwise - it's a decision that could be made on 
the fly. In fact, that would be an interesting feature to offer: Exim could 
generate VERPed bounce messages (for a local list server) in response to PRDR 
rejects.

I can forsee recipients giving a small positive reputational boost to senders 
who implement PRDR.

>  -- Chris
> 
> --
> Chris Knadle
> [email protected]
> 
> -- 
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

-- 
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to