On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Allen Bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And finally, for all those of you reading this that are getting a twitch in > your backsides... > having this almost uncontrollable urge to reply... That would be me (and Dave too I suppose). > asking why in the world I'd want to do something that YOU don't want to > do... > telling me why *I* shouldn't do what *I* want because *YOU* think it's > wrong... > telling how YOU do it because YOU found a work around... All you have to do is edit one setting in the Local/Makefile and rebuild exim. If you use rpms, then get the srpm, install it, find the spot right before the make occurs, and insert a command to edit the Local/Makefile. Build it and install it. > attacking me for having the audacity to have formed a different opinion > that you... Keep in mind that I am not attacking your opinion. As sysadmins, we all have things that we choose to do that are odd, non-standard, and even sometimes unsafe because it makes the business flow better. Rather, I'm curious about the desire to lash out at us for making a security minded decision as if we were doing it to spite *you*. > ... you're as big a part of the problem as anyone else. I'll accept that. ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
