On Dec 2, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Phil Pennock <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > We have to decide on how to resolve a coding issue in Exim, and there > are two fixes available. One fix adds a bunch of complexity. The other > fix just starts using 64-bit integers. I _think_, that as we approach > 2014, we can now rely upon 64-bit integers being available, but we don't > want to leave a platform behind if it's still in use with Exim. > > At present, there are two uses of 64-bit integers in Exim: > > (1) In the DKIM code, which can be disabled; > (2) Encapsulated behind int_eximarith_t which can be redefined on a > per-platform basis. > > We do not ship with any redefinitions of int_eximarith_t, but someone > might be doing so in local packaging. > > If our moving to rely upon 64-bit integers in the core of Exim would > cause problems for your being able to use Exim, please speak up and let > us know.
Will this affect any of the libperl hooks? Todd -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
