On Saturday, January 25, 2014 18:45:06 Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 25/01/14 17:48, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Possible minor documentation bug: the received_header_text (chapter 14) > > uses "tls_in_cipher" which at least for exim 4.80 is a nonexistent > > variable; I used tls_cipher in its place. > > You're reading the current documentation but using a (now) older exim > version. The 4.80 docs list tls_cipher.
Yes. Thanks for checking. I was aware of the version disparity and tried to find the 4.80 documentation, but documentation for previous versions isn't easy to find on the website. I seem to remember being able to find this in the past via link(s) to previous versions, but I don't see [that|those] link(s) now. > http://exim.org/exim-html-4.80/doc/html/spec_html/ch-string_expansions.html# > SECTexpvar received_header_text doesn't appear in the above page, and it feels like it should as the spec says this is a string that gets expanded during routing. http://exim.org/exim-html-4.80/doc/html/spec_html/ch-main_configuration.html#SECTalomo But regardless, you're right -- the 4.80 documentation for the default received_header_text is correct and has tls_cipher. Cool. Thanks. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle [email protected] -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
