On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Todd Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
> You may want to consider implementing DANE, which combines SPF and Ugh, I meant DMARC! I am so sorry. I have been working with DANE for a few days and the wrong acronym flew out of my fingers. > DKIM. If either SPF or DKIM passes. Your logging clearly indicates > that the SPF is passing, so those emails would be accepted based on > DANE instead of rejected based on DKIM. *DMARC* >>>> * do I really need to whitelist facebook as a broken DKIM sender to get >>>> their mail in? > I think DANE could be the ultimate solution to your problem. *DMARC* > But having said that, it would be best to figure out WHY a specific > sender is failing. Temporarily change the deny to a warn and save a > few of those messages. If you could send one or more of those ...which is what Phil was describing with the extra router with "unseen" to save a copy of the message. ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
