On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Michael Fischer v. Mollard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> But nevertheless it might be a good idea to block 8 bit characters in >>>> header names via an ACL test as even RFC 6532 does not allow that. >>> I attached a patch which implements a „verify = header_names“ test as >> I like the patch because it's simple and straightforward. I think the >> chosen "header_names" is a bit too vague for what it actually does. >> I would like to consider a different, more specific, name for it, >> based on what it is actually checking, maybe something like: >> header_names_ascii (I'm partial to this one) >> > No, I think header_names_ascii is best.
Ok, I will rework the patch and change the name. ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
