On 2014-07-17, Julian Bradfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a reason why the "errors-to" parameter to the "deliver" > filter command is restricted to the system filter, even for trusted > users? > > It would be useful to be able to use it in router-specific filters, > because some of my users want their mail delivered to gmail, and gmail > (a) honours SPF etc, (b) has sensitive spam triggers, so if I deliver > mail to gmail with the original sender address, it may well get > bounced. At present I have to have their personal procmails resend it, > but I'd much rather do everything in the router filter. (I have only > three users, and they don't want to touch our mail system:-) > > I'm not sure what the security advantage is, as on most systems it's > trivial to manually reinject the mail with an arbitrary envelope > sender.
It's not so much errors_to as return_path that you need to set. -- umop apisdn -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
