We have had various troubles with sender verify, however I am not sure that any of my users would care to receive messages from a domain without some basic means of receiving a reply. At this point, I am not considering whether the mx record is valid, but I would like to block domains without one. The RBLs are strugling to keep up with all the random "innovative" domains, this seems to be a good tool in the anti-spam arsenal.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > On 21/01/15 11:18, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > There are many legit senders without MX > > record. That is fully ok and there are mail admins out there that do not > > see any reason why to add A and MX with the same content. > > How do they receive bounces? > -- > Jeremy > > > -- > ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/ > -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
