Hi Jeremy (and the list) On 29/01/2015 16:49, Jeremy Harris wrote: > OK, thanks - I have it (I think). The previous bugfix was for the case > of a header_remove in the transport but here we're in a router. It > seems there is almost identical coding, so the fix is obvious. I > should have checked before. Just to confirm, the problem that we (me and Gordon) reported earlier was also from the router section, not transport -- i.e., it never hit the transport as it could not pass through the router. Apologies if that was not evident from the logs that I posted before. But glad that it is out in the open, and we all know the direction to proceed.
>> Also, maybe I should mention I am >> using FreeBSD 10.1 with Exim 4.85 -- though it should not matter as the >> problem appears to be across the board. > Yup, this is a basic application coding fault. > > Thanks for persisting with this. I should be able to get the > development HEAD patched shortly, and the diff attached to bug 1553. Thanks and much appreciated. Best Shah -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
