Mandi! Jan Ingvoldstad In chel di` si favelave... > Consider typical e-mail usage for end users:
You are right. It is all true. And probably if there's really a bandwidth trouble, other mean of transport (UUCP?) suit better. But encoding of the attachment (typically in base64) lead to roughly on 25% more byte, that can be regained easily with compression. > For server to server connections, the overhead for compressing and > decompressing may be undesirable. Sure. I'm still considering some ''special'' needs, like a private network with sites loosly connected each other, via not-so-private link so SSL is needed. Anyway, sorry for the fuss. And thanks. -- Se si insegna a un bambino a programmare in qualche linguaggio informatico, questo esercizio logico lo renderà padrone e non schiavo del computer. (Umberto Eco) -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
