On 2015-04-13, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13/04/15 12:19, Jasen Betts wrote: >> On 2015-04-13, Paul Warren <[email protected]> wrote: >> if there's fewer than 10 entries a "dsearch" lookup may be a better >> match to the task, but creating entries is still problematic - >> you could use embedded perl I guess. > > If lsearch were to be augmented with an lsearch_add, > we'd be a-wanting dsearch_add too :) > > Also lsearch_del ?
also _add and _del for the other simple databases. (dbm etc...) perhaps using a query database like sqlite or redis makes more sense for dynamic data. -- umop apisdn -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
