Joshua Lokken <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul/08 05:38PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Daniel Tryba <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wednesday 08 July 2015 11:54:11 Graeme Fowler wrote: >>>> 'noreply' addresses aren't bogus as such; they're simply designed as >>>> send-only. This is *extremely* common. >>> But incredibly stupid, how will the sender ever know its mail isn't >>> getting delivered to the endpoints? >> That's his problem then, not yours, isn't it? > > But still a valid point, and worth mentioning, IMHO.
Right. But a sender sending a mail without a valid (or /dev/null'd) sender address somehow says "I can't be bothered with bounces.". Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
