On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:45:18PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 20/08/15 18:24, fBXzK kEl1q wrote: > > Thanks, that explanation sounds plausible on first glance. But can it > > be confirmed in the originally attached debug log? > > Here: > > 17:07:39 10433 After routing: > 17:07:39 10433 Local deliveries: > 17:07:39 10433 [email protected] > 17:07:39 10433 Remote deliveries: > 17:07:39 10433 [email protected] > 17:07:39 10433 Failed addresses: > 17:07:39 10433 Deferred addresses: > 17:07:39 10433 search_tidyup called > 17:07:39 10433 \0\[email protected] is a duplicate address: discarded
Jeremy, it really misleads because "Remote deliveries" list is not empty, it contains "[email protected]" and a transport assigned for it. Then, it is unclear which copy is discarded -- printout is not good. And such behaviour seems as a bug, because address is not reinjected for routing, it have been accepted by router and got its transport. The second "working" example of config shows a contradicting result for effectively the same configuration. -- Eugene Berdnikov -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
