Hi Rainer, Rainer Dorsch <[email protected]> (Sa 12 Dez 2015 17:55:19 CET): … > Dec 12 16:53:03 netcup exim4[13510]: 14658 Condition is true: error_message
Without consulting any documentation I'd say an 'error_message' condition is true, if the message's sender is empty. > In my case it is definitely no delivery failure message and from the log for > me no > obvious other error is visible either (the "no IP address found for host" > shows also on > some other messages which work ok). > > Does anybody see why the message below triggers an error_message? > Contact from the remote sender: > Dec 12 16:52:58 netcup exim4[13510]: 13852 Connection request from > 115.73.16.126 port 26375 … Recipient verification: > Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 R: system_aliases for > [email protected] > Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 R: system_aliases for > [email protected] > Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 R: lowuid_aliases for > [email protected] > Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 R: local_user for [email protected] Content scan via spamd: > Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 trying server 127.0.0.1, port 783 Now, as it passed all checks, we accept (and log) the message. > Dec 12 16:53:03 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 LOG: MAIN And the message has an empty (<>) sender. This it's an error message: > Dec 12 16:53:03 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 <= <> H=(115.73.55.172) > [115.73.16.126] P=smtp S=2605 Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE - ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
