On 04/02/16 20:46, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Can't you implement the new requirement in the DATA acl or even in the > QUIT acl? (About QUIT I'm not sure if it fires even on connection loss > after the final dot.)
The other ACL is called in this instance: acl_smtp_notquit - ACL for non-QUIT terminations http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-access_control_lists.html#SECTNOTQUITACL -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
