On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Felipe Gasper <[email protected]> wrote:
I've taken the discussion of the fine details of web configuration off-list. > > Exim's approach is currently a bit too monolithic to be usable for mass > > hosting of many domains with separate certificates, separate > > configurations, and separate logfiles. > > Exim’s approach is BEAUTIFUL for the purpose of separate certificates per > domain. If separate certificates per domain is where your needs end, sure. > I’d be fine with some facility to configure by-domain configs, logs, or > what not in tandem with the certificate. Just as long as it’s still simple > and easy to determine the certificate by the DOMAIN, not by served content. > > Well, SMTP doesn't "serve content" per se, so I don't really get that objection. What I think, is that which certificate gets served, should be fully configurable based on the information available at the time you need to serve the certificate. That's not a lot of information. :) -- Jan -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
