On 2017-09-01 21:49, Paul Lenz wrote: > It seems to me, that using SpamAssassin is like shooting with guns > against flies. I wrote my own SpamAssassin plugin which detects a big > lot of spam, but actually I would be glad if I would not need > SpamAssassin to run my plugin. I would say, 80% of all spam is rather > easy to detect, and a small fast program could do it as well. Only the > rest of 20% should be checked by SpamAssassin using Spamhaus block > lists and other tricky stuff.
spamhaus is one of the least tricky methods, and easy to do without spamassassin. Search the exim spec for 'dnslists'. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. Do obvious transformation on domain to reply privately _only_ on Usenet. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
