No, it looks the same in the mailbox but I have some procmail filters which handle incoming mail. And that can be a problem. Thanks!
пн, 1 окт. 2018 г. в 18:28, Wolfgang Breyha via Exim-users < [email protected]>: > Александр Кириллов via Exim-users wrote on 01/10/2018 16:55: > > Thanks, Wolfgang. Didn't really help much with the part I'm interested: > > > > X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (2.1 points) * -1.0 > ALL_TRUSTED > > Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes > spam > > probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 5.0 GTUBE BODY: Generic > > Test > > for Unsolicited Bulk Email > > How do you add that? It definitely looks better here: > X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.6 points) > * 1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header > * -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list > * manager > * 0.3 MIME_8BIT_HEADER Message header contains 8-bit character > * 1.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily > .... > > And it ever did since 2006;-) > > Or is it possible that your MUA messes with header whitespace? > > Greetings, Wolfgang > -- > Wolfgang Breyha <[email protected]> | https://www.blafasel.at/ > Vienna University Computer Center | Austria > > > -- > ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/ > -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
