On 27 Jan 2019, at 17:30, Cyborg via Exim-users <exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
> I guess, you are not using spamhaus or a similar dns ip blocking service,
> as the sheer amount of "got hacked" fraud messages is insane itselft.

You guess incorrectly.

Part of my day job is running the email infrastructure for a fairly large UK 
university. Today’s rejection stats for our staff email domain run at approx:

* 50% rejected at connect time, whether for DNSBL lookups or other reputation 
services including our own in-house one
* 20% invalid/rubbish/known bad EHLO/HELO
* 15% rejected for invalid recipients or unverifiable senders
* 15% for content-based problems - SpamAssassin, rspamd, malware, other lookups

That’s a fairly quiet day. On weekdays we can reject over 90% of all the 
connections or messages that hit us, into the top hundreds of thousands or low 
millions per day.

We’re of such a scale that we can’t use free DNSBL services, in the main. 
Encouraging people to use the free services is all very well but at scale 
they’ll end up being banned from them (or worst case getting a positive 
response for every lookup in order to discourage them).

As an aside, the SaneSecurity signatures include an awful lot more than just 
malware but should be used with care as some of the sig files are documented as 
having a high FP rate.

Graeme
-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to