On 18 Jan 2020, at 21:39, Maeldron T. via Exim-users <exim-users@exim.org> 
wrote:
> Now the only problem left is that I believe the worker processes connect to
> the smarthost for every message one by one.
> 
> I didn’t find anything in the documentation (current 4.x version) that
> seemed to allow me to tell the queue workers to send more than one email
> through the smarthost.
> 
> This costs me a lot of time and hard cash too especially due to the SSL
> overhead. Did I miss something? Is there a way to make it work?
> 
> (To make it clear, I’m talking about the queue workers on the first SMTP
> server and not on the smarthost).

If you're using a fairly standard configuration, Exim will attempt to deliver 
each message as it arrives. If they arrive from your code one-by-one, it'll 
send them on-by-one. You should let them queue first and then allow the queue 
runner to send multiple per connection - usually they'll be batched by 
destination IP address or domain.

Put your first SMTP server in queue only mode, using 'queue_only = true' in 
your main configuration. This will prevent immediate delivery.

Run your queue frequently - either via the command line switch, where '-q30s' 
will for example spawn a queue runner every 30 seconds; or via cron or a 
systemd timer depending on your init system. The frequency and maximum number 
of queue runners needed will be something you can experiment with.

Use split_spool_directory to ensure a spread of queue files across a spool tree 
rather than having them in a single directory.

If your queues are very (excessively) large, consider splitting the emails into 
named queues rather than the default queue, and run each of those frequently 
via the method described above.

Bear in mind that (for a given system) the definition of "large" will vary, but 
basically every queue runner will iterate over the entire queue (in random 
order, by default), so you're highly likely to end up disk-bound unless you've 
got a *really* fast disk subsystem. Split spool improves that, and named queues 
would improve that even more.

HTH

Graeme
-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to