Hi Jeremy,
   Thanks for clarifying this point yet anyhow even from general point of
   view in terms of security, over SSL seems to be more secure than
   STARTTLS since it sends data in all circumstances in separate commands
   once and after ssl session has been established, verified and connected
   while in STARTTLS it seems that it can send sensitive data as part of
   STARTTLS command and if one is able to degrade STARTTLS connection
   using some of the MITM techniques then connection data can be exposed
   over HTTP. Notice, I reached this conclusion despite there is no
   partically working POC i.e. real vulnerability and merely recommended
   using over SSL as oppose STARTTLS. If this conclusion too is not true
   then I would appreciate your final comment.
   Again, thanks.
   Zakaria.
   On 7 Feb 2022 22:51, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <[email protected]>
   wrote:

     On 07/02/2022 22:15, Zakaria via Exim-users wrote:
     > it seems
     >     STARTTLS is prune to some attack vectors, refer
     >     tohttps://nostarttls.secvuln.info/
     The report there is bogus with respect to Exim.
     --
     Cheers,
        Jeremy
     --
     ## List details at
     https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
     ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
     ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to