On 2022-04-30 James via Exim-users <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29/04/2022 20:07, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> > Do we have *new* taintchecks that break > > configurations that were considered secure with 4.95? > I has a hash_32_64 of data, accepted in 4.95, requires quote_pgsql with > 4.96. > Does a hash pass a taint? Whatever, easily adjusted in my config. Could you show the complete transport/router that triggered the error and how you modified the router to fix this? TIA, cu Andreas -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
