Le 25/10/2023 à 05:44, Jasen Betts via Exim-users a écrit :
On 2023-10-24, Bruno CAPELETO via Exim-users<[email protected]>  wrote:
Dear Jasen,

The altermime filter does the job well with Exim, as long as I do not
use DKIM. So I do not think the issue is there.
Just because something appears to work doesn't mean that it actually
worked.

And yet DKIM works fine without altermime.

Perhaps it is in my mind due to a recent bug report that exim is
sensitive to mixing different line endings in a single email, but I
also remeber haviong to do things with line endings to get python
"email" to handle the stream from Exim and for Exim to handle the
stream back from python "email".

ould you please also test sending a mail to mail-tester.com ?
My filter-modified email passed DKIM on mail-tester.com so I can
confirm that mail-tester.com appears to me to be functioning correctly.


Dear all,

This issue is not solved for me, and I do not see where to look further. So I need help.

I do use the altermime filter. As far as Jeremy said, the filter is processed first, then the message is signed.

So how could the filter be the issue to a wrong signature ?

Looking at the description of the transport option "size_addition", I understand that the size of the message is sent by smtp before the message is processed by the filter.

I am not sure about my understanding of this option. Could that be a possible source of the error I obtain ?



--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##   https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
##   [email protected]
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to