Thanks. This is possible, the old version is still installed, but I was testing direct from the compiled binary directory assuming (probably incorrectly by the sounds of things) it was self contained except for the config.
Is there a way to test without the other in conflict, or do you have to go the full hog and go for a final make install to test properly ? Would it be safe to do a make DESTDIR=/some/directory/ install and run from that, or would it still have issues ? Thanks a lot for the help. On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 5:01 PM Ian Z via Exim-users < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 02:03:30PM +0000, Ian B via Exim-users wrote: > > > Thanks, default was OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips however, I've just tried > > compiling a new OpenSSL 1.1.1w, (output below), but weirdly I get an > > error when testing sending a message with it... > > > exim: malformed message id 1rDlww-000000002Hg-16uR after -Mc option > > The format of the message ids has changed in 4.97. This looks a bit as > if you had both versions on your PATH and the wrong one got used > here. Is that possible? > > -- > Ian > > -- > ## subscription configuration (requires account): > ## > https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/ > ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): > ## [email protected] > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/ > -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## [email protected] ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
